Friday, April 16, 2010

So I have worked on the form primarily on the Pakenham side, whereas I have moved over to developing a workable floor plan for the City side. Obviously this means renders are from Pakenham and floor plan is from City.
Any feedback would be great, floor plan is not to scale.





Cheers, Danni

4 comments:

  1. wow this looks amazing! how do you do such good renders? i don't really know how to do materials

    ReplyDelete
  2. danni, im not sure what you wanted feedback on, the renders are really good, you just need to get some people and context into them. As for the plans the layout seems logical. Im not sure how developed they are but line work needs a bit of work (you may know this) also instead of writing words and arrows, you can use a numbering system and a key on the side, it makes the drawing clearer and looks a heap better

    evie

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Danni - the plans are a good start - however they will need more work to get to the level of the renders. It would be good to know how the station would work if/when it is upgraded to a premium station. Also - it would be could to show the extent of the canopy over (as a dotted line) to explain better how the scheme works. Is there any change in floor surface?...and how would this be expressed? As Evie has commented the notation is distracting and needs more thought. How about showing the train lines to give a sense of context? How do you get from one side to the other, and how will this be shown?....is a second plan required??
    hope this helps
    A

    ReplyDelete
  4. ...also - you should consider getting some sky ,context and people into your renders to really get them flying...
    A

    ReplyDelete